This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
875 posters, 25 topics, 3,440 authors, 1,061 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
March 25-28, 2026 | Tampa, FL, USA

P622
Foregut
Introduction
Achalasia is a rare disorder of the esophageal smooth muscle
characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal
sphincter (LES) and absent or spastic contractions in the
esophageal body1. The crude prevalence in Medicare of
achalasia per 100,000 persons aged 65 or older was 162.1 in
20152. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard
for diagnosis and based on this, this disease is further
categorized into 3 distinct 3 types: type l, type ll and type lll.
Treatment is aimed at relieving symptoms because there is no
cure for achalasia3. This may be achieved through calcium
channel inhibitors, pneumatic dilation of the LES, botox
injections, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), Heller
myotomy and ultimately, esophagectomy.
Aim
This study aims to delineate the natural history of achalasia,
emphasizing the infrequency of esophagectomy as a treatment
outcome, examining the spectrum of therapeutic alternatives
preceding esophagectomy, and establishing a timeline for
disease progression. Another objective of the study is to try to
identify variables may predict therapeutic failure.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of all patients
diagnosed with achalasia between 2019 and 2025 at our
institution. Data was extracted from institutional medical records.
Achalasia was diagnosed using a timed barium swallow (TBS)
study and/or HRM. Patients who had an esophagectomy for any
other diagnosis that was not achalasia, were ruled out of the
study. Statistical significance of the mean of quantitative
variables was measured with paired-t tests and chi square and
Fisher’s test were used for comparison of qualitative values.
Results
A total of 147 patients were included. Five patients underwent
esophagecrtomy for achalasia (3.4%), while 142 patients were
treated with Heller myotomy. Patient demographics, comorbidities,
and presenting symptoms are summarized in Table 1.
In the esophagectomy cohort, four patients had a prior myotomy
before esophagectomy. The average duration of symptoms prior to
esophagectomy was 13 years. Among those with prior myotomy, the
average interval to esophagectomy was 10.5 years. All patients in
this cohort had end-stage achalasia. Procedures were robotic, with
one case requiring an open thoracic portion and one conversion to
open. Two patient developed postoperative leaks, and four
experienced symptom recurrence, with an average time of 145 days
after esophagectomy.
In the Heller myotomy cohort, patients reported an average symptom
duration of 7.5 years prior to intervention. Prior treatments included
Botox injection (32), esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) dilation
(89), POEM (3), and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)
tube placement (1). At <6 months follow-up, 1.49% of patient
reported worsening symptoms compared with preoperative status. At
last follow-up, 4 patients reported worse symptoms than
preoperatively. Symptom recurrence occurred in 27 patients, with an
average time to management of 383 days after myotomy.
Conclusions
Esophagectomy is a rare outcome in the treatment of achalasia. In
our cohort, Heller myotomy provided excellent symptom control at
six month and at last follow-up. No predictive variables for therapy
failure were identified.