This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
1,267 posters, 47 videos, 13 topics, 4 sessions, 853 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
September 9 - 12, 2026 | George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
ALL - 606
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
Title: High-Dose Methotrexate (HDMTX) Protocol Adherence: A Quality Improvement Study at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Pakistan
Authors: Muhammad Sher Ali, Beenish Aqib, Muhammad Imran, Fatima Tariq, Aftab Ahmad, Shehzad Ali Khan, Ehsan Elahi, Usman Ahmed, Syed Waqas Imam Bokhari, Bushra Ahsan
Affiliation: Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
Background: High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is an integral part of curative therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and CNS lymphoma. Its narrow therapeutic index and dependence on adequate hydration, urinary alkalinization, and timely leucovorin rescue make strict protocol adherence essential to prevent life-threatening toxicity. Adherence data from resource-limited, lower-middle-income country (LMIC) settings remain very limited.
Aim: To evaluate adherence to an institutionally defined 11-point HDMTX safety checklist across 145 infusion cycles, and to determine its association with clinical outcomes — complications, ICU admission, toxic MTX levels, and mortality — in an LMIC setting.
Methods: This retrospective quality-improvement review analyzed 145 HDMTX cycles in 68 patients (2024–2025) across 8 chemotherapy protocols at a tertiary cancer center. Eleven safety points were assessed, including pre-/post-MTX hydration, urinary pH monitoring, correct MTX dose and infusion duration, timely leucovorin initiation and dosing, and 24–72-hour MTX clearance. Outcomes were compared between high- and lower-adherence cycles.
Results: Mean adherence was 96.3%, with 130/145 cycles (89.7%) achieving >80% adherence. Pre-MTX hydration and urinary alkalinization were 100% compliant. The key adherence gaps were post-MTX urine pH maintenance and leucovorin timing (86.2% each). Toxic MTX levels occurred in 5 cycles (3.4%), all linked to leucovorin dosing/timing errors. Complications occurred in 24 cycles (16.6%), most commonly mucositis (6.9%) and febrile neutropenia (4.8%); there were 10 ICU admissions (6.9%), one directly MTX-related. Complication rates varied by diagnosis (NHL 21.9%, ALL 11.9%, CNS lymphoma 0%). Cycles with <80% adherence had markedly worse outcomes than those with ≥80% adherence: complications (40% vs 13.8%), ICU admission (26.7% vs 4.7%), and toxic MTX levels (13.3% vs 2.3%).
Conclusions: The 11-point HDMTX safety checklist should be embedded into every institutional infusion protocol. Post-infusion urinary pH monitoring and timely leucovorin rescue are the most critical, modifiable vulnerabilities. Automated alerts, standardized order sets, and a real-time "Protocol Violation Flag" are recommended to prevent severe toxicity. A validated institutional adherence scoring system is proposed for prospective use.