This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
1,267 posters, 47 videos, 13 topics, 4 sessions, 853 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
September 9 - 12, 2026 | George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
MM - 578
Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Introduction
• Lenalidomide (LEN) plus an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
and dexamethasone (DEX) is a standard of care for patients
with transplant-ineligible (TNE)/transplant-deferred newly
diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM)1
— In the MAIA and BENEFIT trials, minimal residual disease (MRD)
negativity was achieved by less than one-third of patients,
suggesting a high-unmet need for therapies that achieve deep
and durable responses in patients with TNE NDMM2,3
• Iberdomide (IBER) is a CELMoD agent with superior potency
than LEN and may provide additional therapeutic benefit
when given in combination with daratumumab (DARA) and
DEX (IberDd)4 (Figure 1)
— IBER binds cereblon (CRBN) with higher affinity and unique
interactions compared with immunomodulatory drug (IMiD®)
agents; preclinically, IBER has shown deep MM-cell killing in
combination with DARA versus IMiD agents4,5
• The synergistic activity of IberDd has been observed in the
ongoing phase 1/2 CC-220-MM-001 clinical trial (NCT02773030)
— Preliminary results show high response rates (94.7%) and a
manageable safety profile in TNE/transplant-deferred NDMM6
Objective
• To report updated results with extended follow-up from the
IberDd dose-expansion cohort of the CC-220-MM-001 trial in
patients with NDMM who are TNE or not receiving autologous stem
cell transplant (ASCT) as their first therapy
Methods
• CC-220-MM-001 is a phase 1/2 trial evaluating IBER with different
treatment combinations in MM (Figure 2)
• Key patient eligibility criteria, treatments, and objectives are
shown in Figure 3
• The data cutoff date for the analysis was March 3, 2025
Results
• Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1
• At almost 2 years median follow-up, 66.7% of patients remained
on therapy (Table 2)
— No deaths were attributed to study treatment
• Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 hematologic
treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) (78.7%); few
grade 3/4 non-hematologic TEAEs, excluding infections,
occurred (Table 3)
— Grade 3/4 diarrhea not reported to date
Conclusions
• At 22 months, IberDd continues to show deepening responses in
TNE NDMM
— Many responses were rapid, and ≥ CR rates improved from
44.0% to 68.0% within 12 months
— MRD negativity rate with ≥ CR was 56.0% and no plateau has
been observed, which is notable in the context of DARA,
LEN, and DEX in NDMM2
• The safety profile of IberDd was manageable, with no new
safety signals
— Most common grade 3/4 TEAE was neutropenia
— Few patients discontinued IBER due to AEs; 66.7% are still on
treatment
• These results support the evaluation of IberDd in TNE NDMM
and the role of novel therapies in achieving deep and durable
responses in NDMM and RRMM
— IberDd is also being investigated in the ongoing