This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
1,267 posters, 47 videos, 13 topics, 4 sessions, 853 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
September 9 - 12, 2026 | George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
ABCL - 483
Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma (ABCL)
Context: Glofit-GemOx demonstrated survival benefits in patients with R/R DLBCL after ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) in the Phase 3 STARGLO trial (NCT04408638).
Objective: Report updated efficacy and safety with 3 years of follow-up.
Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to Glofit-GemOx (8 cycles; 4 cycles glofitamab monotherapy) or R-GemOx (8 cycles) and stratified by prior LOT (1 vs ≥2) and refractoriness to last therapy. Following obinutuzumab pretreatment, step-up doses of glofitamab were given (weekly, 2.5/10mg; Cycle 1), then 30mg (every 21 days from Cycle 2 Day 1). Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints: IRC-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and complete response (CR) rate.
Results: Of 274 (Glofit-GemOx, n=183; R-GemOx, n=91; intent-to-treat [ITT]) patients enrolled, 62.8% and 37.2% had 1 and ≥2 LOT, respectively; 55.8% had primary refractory disease. As of May 1, 2025 (median follow-up: 35.1 months), Glofit-GemOx showed sustained benefit versus R-GemOx in the ITT: median OS, 25.5 versus 12.5 months (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43–0.83); median PFS, 14.4 versus 3.3 months (HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.29–0.57); CR rate, 58.5% versus 25.3%; 36-month OS estimates, 47.1% versus 27.4%; 30-month PFS estimates, 38.1% versus 15.2%. Among patients who achieved CR at any time point, median duration of CR was not reached (95% CI: 27.2–not estimable [NE]; Glofit-GemOx, n=107) versus 24.2 months (95% CI: 6.9–NE; R-GemOx, n=23). Among Glofit-GemOx-treated patients with a CR at EOT, 24-month OS and PFS estimates were 79.4% and 74.2%, respectively. A more pronounced efficacy benefit was observed with Glofit-GemOx versus R-GemOx in patients with 1 prior LOT: median OS, not reached versus 14.4 months (HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38–0.89); median PFS, 20.4 versus 5.5 months (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31–0.78); CR rate, 63.5% versus 28.1%. No new safety signals were identified. Cytokine release syndrome remained the most common adverse event (44.8%).
Conclusions: After 3 years of follow-up, Glofit-GemOx demonstrated sustained benefits, with superior OS, PFS and CR rates versus R-GemOx in patients with R/R DLBCL, and maintained a manageable safety profile. This analysis supports Glofit-GemOx as a potentially curative, off-the-shelf treatment for autologous stem cell transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL.