This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
1,267 posters, 47 videos, 13 topics, 4 sessions, 853 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
September 9 - 12, 2026 | George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
ABCL - 285
Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma (ABCL)
Background:
Despite the transformative efficacy of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), durable remission remains limited to a subset of patients. Tumor-intrinsic mechanisms mediating immune escape are incompletely defined. The CXCR4–CXCL12 axis is a key regulator of malignant B-cell trafficking, tumor microenvironment homing, and immune evasion, and has been associated with adverse prognosis in DLBCL. We hypothesized that elevated CXCR4 expression correlates with inferior response to CAR T-cell therapy.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database, identifying adult patients with DLBCL treated with CD19 CAR T-cell therapy (2018-2023). CXCR4 expression was stratified as high vs low using available immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring and RNA-sequencing proxies. Primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and relapse rate. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models adjusted for age, stage, LDH, prior lines of therapy, and extranodal involvement.
Results:
Among 1,842 eligible patients, 38% demonstrated high CXCR4 expression. High CXCR4 was associated with significantly lower ORR (52% vs 71%, p<0.001) and inferior complete response rates (34% vs 56%). Median PFS was reduced in the CXCR4-high cohort (6.8 vs 14.2 months; HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.52–2.09, p<0.001). Two-year relapse rates were higher (58% vs 34%, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, high CXCR4 remained independently associated with inferior PFS (adjusted HR 1.61, p<0.001) and lower odds of response (adjusted OR 0.48, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated pronounced effects in patients with extranodal disease and bone marrow involvement.
Discussion:
These findings support CXCR4 as a biologically plausible driver of CAR T resistance. Mechanistically, CXCR4 signaling promotes tumor cell trafficking and retention within protective niches, limiting CAR T-cell infiltration and persistence. Preclinical data suggest that modulation of CXCR4 may enhance CAR T-cell trafficking and antitumor efficacy.
Conclusions:
High CXCR4 expression correlates with inferior response, shorter PFS, and increased relapse following CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in DLBCL. Prospective studies integrating CXCR4-targeted strategies with CAR T therapy are warranted to overcome microenviron