This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
1,267 posters, 47 videos, 13 topics, 4 sessions, 853 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
September 9 - 12, 2026 | George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
ABCL - 489
Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma (ABCL)
CONTEXT: In the phase 1b First-MIND study, Tafa (anti-CD19 mAb)-Len-R-CHOP demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.
OBJECTIVE: frontMIND, a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, compared Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP in patients with high-risk aggressive BCLs.
DESIGN: Patients (18–80y) with previously untreated, high intermediate- and high-risk (IPI 3–5, aaIPI 2–3 if ≤60y) DLBCL or HGBL and ECOG PS ≤2 were randomized 1:1 to Tafa-Len-R-CHOP or R-CHOP. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; secondary endpoints included: EFS, OS, CR, ORR, safety. CD19 expression in tumor biopsies collected at baseline and relapse was assessed centrally and measured by IHC.
RESULTS: At primary analysis (data cutoff October 20, 2025), 899 patients were assigned to Tafa-Len-R-CHOP (n=448) or R-CHOP (n=451); baseline characteristics were similar between arms. At median follow-up of 35.2 months, Tafa-Len-R-CHOP significantly improved PFS vs R-CHOP (HR 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.96]; P=0.019) with 24-month PFS of 71.1% vs 62.9% in the overall population; in patients with centrally confirmed lymphoma subtypes (n=773), PFS HR was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.88) and 24-months PFS was 72.7% vs 62.2%. Point estimates suggested PFS benefit with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP across almost every prespecified subgroup, including ABC and GCB molecular subtypes. Tafa-Len-R-CHOP significantly improved EFS; CR and ORR were similar between arms, and the HR for OS was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.63, 1.14) (final OS at 5y). At relapse, all patients in the Tafa-Len-R-CHOP arm with lymphoma detected in biopsy tissue were CD19 positive (14/14). For Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP, any-grade TEAEs were similar (98.6% vs 97.1%), more grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP (86.7% vs 76.1%) and TEAEs led to all study drug discontinuation in 5.2% vs 5.4% of patients, respectively. More fatal TEAEs occurred with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (5.9% vs 3.8%), but fewer deaths overall (18.5% vs 21.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Tafa-Len-R-CHOP resulted in a significant 25% reduction in risk of disease progression or death vs R-CHOP, without affecting CD19 expression in relapse biopsies. TEAEs were manageable and consistent with the expected safety profile. Tafa-Len-R-CHOP represents a new first-line standard of care option for patients with high-risk DLBCL or HGBL, regardless of COO molecular subtype.