This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
516 posters, 59 topics, 63 sessions, 1,127 authors, 353 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
April 29 - May 3, 2026 | Montreal, Quebec Canada

2340608
Patient Voices
Patient Satisfaction and Preference Valuation in Neuraxial Labor Analgesia Across a Diverse Population
Diana M. Ruiz, BS; Lucy Shang, BA; Beilin Yaakov, MD; Daniel Katz, MD
April 30, 2026
Background and Hypothesis
Neuraxial Labor Analgesia (NLA) is the most effective method for labor pain relief.
Compared to non-neuraxial methods, NLA:
- Provides superior analgesia
- Reduces the need for additional pain control
- Improves maternal satisfaction
Disparities persist in LEA utilization:
- Lower use among Black, Hispanic, and Asian women compared to non-Hispanic White women
While utilization disparities are well documented, less is known about:
- Differences in patient satisfaction
- Variations in anesthesia-related preferences
Study Objectives:
- Assess differences in patient satisfaction with LEA
- Evaluate differences in patient preferences
Hypothesis:
- Satisfaction and preferences are similar across demographic and socioeconomic groups
Study Design and Methods
Design: Cross-sectional, single-site survey
Population: Postpartum patients after vaginal delivery
Outcomes:
- Satisfaction with LEA (0–100 scale)
- Preference valuation: Allocation of hypothetical $100 across 10 anesthesia-related outcomes
- Higher dollar amount = greater perceived importance
Variables (dichotomized):
- Race/Ethnicity
- Income (> vs. ≤ $52,000)
- Education (< Bachelor’s vs. ≥ Bachelor’s)
- Insurance (Medicaid vs. Commercial)
- Marital Status
- Nationality (US-born vs. foreign-born)
Analysis:
- Descriptive statistics
- Independent Welch’s t-tests
- Significance threshold: p < 0.05
Results
The cohort was socioeconomically diverse.
Satisfaction:
- High overall: 92.8 ± 12.9
- No significant differences across demographic groups
Patient Preferences:
- Avoidance of labor pain = highest valued outcome
- Mean: $39.8 ± 25.9
- Consistent across subgroups
Key Differences in Pain Valuation:
- Higher among:
- White non-Hispanic vs. non-White/Hispanic
- Married vs. unmarried
Conclusion / Key Findings & Implications
High overall satisfaction:
- Neuraxial labor analgesia satisfaction was consistently high
- No significant differences across demographic or socioeconomic groups
Differences in patient priorities:
- White, non-Hispanic and married patients placed greater value on labor pain control compared to non-White/Hispanic and unmarried patients
Clinical Implication:
- Similar satisfaction scores may mask meaningful differences in patient priorities
- Highlights the need for patient-centered counseling in NLA
References
1. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):CD000331.
2. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019;133(3):e208–e225.
3. Glance LG, Wissler R, Glantz C, et al. Racial differences in the use of epidural analgesia for labor. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(1):19–28.
4. Craig R, El Nour S, Xuereb LB, et al. Racial and ethnic disparity in obstetric anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2025;80(7):757–770.