This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
301 posters, 50 videos, 13 topics, 13 sessions, 734 authors, 193 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
10 - 13 June, 2026 | Miami, Florida

P72
ERAS
The Risk of Early Discharge Following Mitral Valve Repair
Andres Martinez Plotnikow, BS1, Lily G. Bessette, MS1, Johannes Bonatti, MD1, Xander Jacquemyn, MD1, Anvith Ramadugu, BS1, Yisi Wang, MPH2, Floyd Thoma, BS1, Takuya Ogami, MD1, Ibrahim Sultan, MD1, Irsa S. Hasan, MD1
1 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
2University of Pittsburgh MedicalCenter, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
|
Table 1. Propensity scored matched patient characteristics |
|||
|
Early discharge (Before PSM N = 110; After 1:1 PSM N = 109) |
Late discharge (Before PSM N = 789; After 1:1 PSM N = 109)
|
SMD |
|
|
Age; median (Q1-Q3) |
57.0 (47.0-65.0) |
58.0 (48.0-65.0) |
0.05 |
|
Female; n (%) |
32 (29.4%) |
36 (33.0%) |
0.08 |
|
Diabetes mellitus; n (%) |
4 (3.7%) |
6 (5.5%) |
0.08 |
|
Hypertension; n (%) |
54 (49.5%) |
60 (55.0%) |
0.10 |
|
Arrhythmia; n (%) |
7 (6.4%) |
4 (3.7%) |
0.12 |
|
Ejection fraction; median (Q1-Q3) |
0.4 (0.3-0.6) |
0.4 (0.3-0.6) |
0.01 |
|
Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73m2); median (Q1-Q3) |
60.0 (55.0-63.0) |
58.0 (55.0-63.0) |
0.10 |
|
BMI (kg/m2); median (Q1-Q3) |
91.2 (81.8-101) |
91.9 (77.0-101) |
0.07 |
|
STS Risk Score; median (Q1-Q3) |
25.7 (22.7-28.1) |
25.4 (22.7-28.0) |
0.03 |
|
Table 2. Perioperative outcomes |
|||
|
Early discharge (N = 109) |
Late discharge (N = 109) |
P-value |
|
|
Post-operative stroke; n (%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
NA |
|
Re-operation for bleeding; n (%) |
1 (0.9%) |
2 (1.8%) |
0.561 |
|
Re-operation; n (%) |
2 (1.8%) |
3 (2.8%) |
0.651 |
|
Renal failure; n (%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
NA |
|
Post-operative pacemaker implantation; n (%) |
0 (0.0%) |
1 (0.9%) |
0.316 |
|
Lower extremity paralysis; n (%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
NA |
|
Table 3. Postoperative outcomes |
|||
|
Early discharge (N = 109) |
Late discharge (N = 109) |
P-value |
|
|
MACCE at 30 days; n (%) |
5 (4.6%) |
5 (4.6%) |
1 |
|
MACCE at 1 year; n (%) |
8 (7.3%) |
13 (11.9%) |
0.251 |
|
Any readmission at 30 days; n (%) |
7 (6.4%) |
12 (11.0%) |
0.23 |
|
Any readmission at 1 year; n (%) |
10 (9.2%) |
19 (17.4%) |
0.073 |
|
All-cause mortality at 30 days; n (%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
NA |
|
All-cause mortality at 1 year; n (%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
NA |
|
Atrial fibrillation at 30 days; n (%) |
1 (0.9%) |
0 (0.0%) |
0.316 |
|
Atrial fibrillation at 1 year; n (%) |
2 (1.8%) |
2 (1.8%) |
1 |
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for early vs. late discharge following isolated MVr
CONCLUSION
Early discharge after MVr did not significantly increase the risk of 30-day or 1-year MACCE, death, cardiac events, or readmission. Future studies should focus on the integration of risk stratification tools within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols to identify and counsel patients who are eligible for safe early discharge after MVr surgery.