This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
301 posters, 50 videos, 13 topics, 13 sessions, 734 authors, 193 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
10 - 13 June, 2026 | Miami, Florida

P34
Coronary Revascularization
Background
Obesity is traditionallyconsidered a risk factorforcoronaryartery bypass surgeryduetoincreasedperioperativeandpostoperativemorbidity. Data regardingthefeasibilityandmid-termoutcomes of isolatedminimallyinvasivecoronaryartery bypass (MiCAB) surgery in obesepatientsremainlimited. Weaimedtoevaluateearlyandfive-yearoutcomes of obesepatientsundergoingisolatedMiCAB in a high-volumecenter.
Methods
Allconsecutiveobesepatients (body massindex ≥30 kg/m²) whounderwentisolatedmulti-vesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryartery bypass surgerybetween 2020 and 2025 wereretrospectivelyanalyzed. Thesurgicalapproachconsisted of MICS-CABG usingarterialand/orvenousgraftingstrategies. Primaryendpointsincludedearlypostoperativeoutcomesandfive-yearmajor adverse cardiacandcerebrovascularevents (MACCE). Secondaryendpointswereoperativemortality, conversiontosternotomy, length of intensivecareunitandhospitalstay, andtheneedforrepeatrevascularization.
Results
Duringthestudyperiod, a total of 457 patientsunderwentMiCABsurgery. Amongthem, 163 obesepatientsunderwentisolatedMiCABandconstitutedthestudypopulation. Themeanagewas 59.9 ± 9.2 years; 25 patientswerefemaleand 138 weremale. Themean body massindexwas 33.3 ± 3.7 kg/m², and 12 patients had a BMI >40 kg/m². Obesepatientsdemonstratedhigherrates of cardiovascularcomorbidities, whileoperativecharacteristicsremainedlargelycomparablebetweengroups (Table 1). Representativeperioperativeimages of thesurgicaltechniqueandpostoperativecosmeticoutcomesarepresented in Figure 1 and 2.
Revascularizationstrategiesincluded LIMA–LAD bypass in 13 patientsandmulti-vessel bypass in 151 patients; fullarterialrevascularizationwasperformed in 51 patients. Therewasnooperativemortality, andnoconversionstosternotomywererequired.
Postoperatively, new-onsetatrialfibrillationoccurred in 16 patients, andonepatientexperienced a cerebrovascularevent. Themeanintensivecareunitstaywas 1.4 days, andthemeanhospitalstaywas 5.1 days. Onepatientdevelopedsuddencardiacarrestduringintensivecareunitfollow-upandwasconsidered an in-hospitaldeath. Duringthesecond-yearpostoperativefollow-up, two patientsdied: onefromgastriccancerandonefrompulmonaryembolism. Earlypostoperativeoutcomes, including ICU stay, hospitalstay, drainage, arrhythmia, revision, andconversiontosternotomy, werecomparablebetweenobeseandnon-obesepatients (Table 2).
At thefirstpostoperative-weekfollow-up, superficialwoundinfectionwasobserved in 16 patients. Three patientsdevelopeddeepwoundinfectionsrequiringantibiotictherapyandvacuum-assistedclosuretreatment, followedbysurgicalwoundrevision.
Duringfollow-up, sixpatientswithatypicalanginaunderwentconventionalcoronaryangiography. Graft occlusionwasdetected in threepatients: oneinvolvingboththe RCA and OM grafts, oneinvolvingthe RCA graft, andoneinvolving a radialartery graft tothe OM. Thesepatientsweresuccessfullytreatedwith PCI. Additionally, coronary CT angiographywasperformed in 65 patientsforcontrolpurposes, revealingsmall-caliberradialarteries in two patientsandradialarteryocclusion in onepatient. No patientrequiredrepeat CABG surgery. five-yearfreedomfrom MACCE was 2.45%.
Conclusions
Inobesepatients, isolatedmulti-vesselminimallyinvasivecoronaryartery bypass surgery can be performedsafelywithexcellentearlyand two-yearoutcomes in experienced, high-volumecenters. Obesityaloneshould not be considered a contraindicationformulti-vesselMiCAB.