This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
206 posters, 13 topics, 5 sessions, 713 authors, 294 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
May 2-5, 2026 | Lihue, HI

D13
Shelby Chun Fat, Shuyan Wei, Hamzah Almadani, Farin Amersi, Philip Brazio
Education and Practice Management
Introduction: Vascular compromise of free flaps most commonly occurs within 48 hours postoperatively1. Re-exploration salvage rates are ~70%2. Meticulous monitoring is essential for early detection. Most studies in the literature focus on educating nurses in postoperative flap monitoring. At many institutions, off-service residents care for these patients overnight. This knowledge gap is an opportunity to adapt and tailor the nursing educational framework for residents. We created a time-efficient, multi-component online module to improve first-year residents’ competency in free flap monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of each component in improving knowledge and self-reported comfort levels.
Methods: Residents cross-covering plastic surgery patients at Cedars-Sinai Medical center (Los Angeles, CA) were included. These included general surgery, neurosurgery, urology, anesthesia, podiatry, ENT, orthopedic, and cardiothoracic surgery residents. For 2 years (2024-2025), they were assigned: 1) Online module: Pamphlet, 11-minute PowerPoint presentation, supplemental videos and 2) 1.5 hour in-person session with hands-on clinical experience with dopplers. Participants were asked to complete background questions, comfort level surveys (before and after), knowledge-based quizzes (before and after), and feedback questions. Statistical analysis was performed with R software.
Results: 55 residents completed the module. 7 (12.7%) had previous experience in the OR with free flaps and 13 (23.6%) had experience monitoring free flaps postoperatively. The online module improved knowledge scores from 69.3% to 88.8% (p<0.001). After the in-person session the quiz score decreased by 4.6%. The mean knowledge score increased from 72.6 to 85.4% (p<0.001) after the module. The online module improved the comfort levels across all 5 questions (p<0.001). After the in-person session, the composite comfort score decreased (p=0.002). However, after the entire training, all comfort levels increased (p<0.001) with the largest improvement in monitoring free flaps. There was no significant association between comfort level and quiz performance (p=0.061). The free text responses for suggested improvement included: examples of scratch test, additional images/videos, ability to access materials (updated in 2025 version), different skin tones, and “on-call” scenarios.
Discussion: The online module had the greatest impact in knowledge scores and comfort level. This was also reported as the most effective format by participants. There was a decrease in scores after in-person session, which was likely a result of awareness of complexity of physical exam after a hands-on experience. Despite this, the overall knowledge scores and comfort levels significantly increased when compared to the pre-module scores. Some of the limitations include a small sample size, education conducted at varying timepoints, and a focus on foundational clinical skills without reviewing monitoring adjuncts. Future studies include comparing free flap salvage rates before and after integration of the module.
Conclusion: A structured, multi-component online module is time-efficient and effective in training first-year residents on free flap monitoring. Ultimately, we hope to increase recognition of impending flap compromise and improve care of patients undergoing free flaps.