This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
1,267 posters, 47 videos, 13 topics, 4 sessions, 853 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
September 9 - 12, 2026 | George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
MPN - 1691
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN)
Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b Shows Consistent Numerical Thrombotic Benefit Over Hydroxyurea Across All Endpoints in 285 Propensity-Matched Patients with Polycythemia Vera
AUTHORS
Vedant Shah MD¹ · Ansy Patel MD² · Pragya Jain MD³ · Shivam Patel MD³ · Bolivia Crocete Aloysia Fernandes MD¹ · Canan Dirican MD¹ · Sri Harsha Narayana MD¹ · Joel Alcid MD¹
AFFILIATIONS
¹NYMC GME at St. Mary's and St. Clare's Health, Denville, NJ · ²SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY · ³Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Beaumont, TX
BACKGROUND
METHODS
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network (172 healthcare organizations)
Population: Adults with polycythemia vera (ICD-10: D45, ×2 within 3 months), initiating ropeginterferon alfa-2b or hydroxyurea as first cytoreductive agent on or after November 1, 2021
Exclusions: Prior exposure to comparator agent, ruxolitinib, antecedent thromboembolism within 1 year, myelofibrosis, acute myeloid leukemia
Propensity Score Matching (1:1): Age, sex, race, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, COPD, anticoagulant use, antiplatelet use, platelet count, leukocyte count, HbA1c
Outcomes (3-year window): Venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism, portal vein thrombosis, venous embolism), composite thromboembolism (VTE, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, arterial embolism), phlebotomy frequency (CPT 99195)
Statistical Analysis: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank testing, hazard ratios, risk difference, independent samples t-test
Before Matching: RPI n=311 · HU n=3,161
After Matching: RPI n=285 · HU n=285
CENTRAL HEADLINE
Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b Shows Consistent Numerical Thrombotic Benefit Over Hydroxyurea Across All Endpoints in 285 Propensity-Matched Patients
RESULTS
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
3-year KM free: RPI 94.31% vs HU 88.81%
HR (95% CI): 0.76 (0.37–1.58)
p (log-rank): 0.461
Composite Thromboembolism (TE)
3-year KM free: RPI 90.75% vs HU 82.40%
HR (95% CI): 0.61 (0.34–1.08)
p (log-rank): 0.086
Phlebotomy Burden
Mean events: RPI 0.94 vs HU 1.37
Patients with phlebotomy: RPI 72 vs HU 85
p-value: 0.052
Crude Thrombotic Event Rates:
VTE crude rate: RPI 4.6% vs HU 5.6%
Composite TE crude rate: RPI 6.7% vs HU 10.2%
PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING: BEFORE AND AFTER
Age (median): Pre-RPI 55, Pre-HU 71 (p<0.001) → Post-RPI 57, Post-HU 56 (p=0.711)
Female: Pre-RPI 53.4%, Pre-HU 50.5% (p=0.326) → Post-RPI 53.3%, Post-HU 52.3% (p=0.801)
Hypertension: Pre-RPI 30.9%, Pre-HU 51.1% (p<0.001) → Post-RPI 31.6%, Post-HU 29.5% (p=0.585)
Diabetes: Pre-RPI 7.4%, Pre-HU 16.8% (p<0.001) → Post-RPI 7.7%, Post-HU 7.0% (p=0.748)
Ischemic HD: Pre-RPI 7.7%, Pre-HU 19.0% (p<0.001) → Post-RPI 8.1%, Post-HU 8.8% (p=0.763)
CKD: Pre-RPI 3.2%, Pre-HU 13.0% (p<0.001) → Post-RPI 3.5%, Post-HU 4.2% (p=0.664)
Heart Failure: Pre-RPI 3.2%, Pre-HU 9.1% (p<0.001) → Post-RPI 3.5%, Post-HU 3.5% (p=1.000)
Channeling bias corrected after 1:1 propensity score matching
DISCUSSION
LIMITATIONS
REFERENCES