This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
1,267 posters, 47 videos, 13 topics, 4 sessions, 853 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
September 9 - 12, 2026 | George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
MCL - 522
Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)
Introduction: Frontline treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains heterogeneous with no universal standard. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have been integrated into chemoimmunotherapy, chemotherapy-free, and transplant-based approaches, but their comparative efficacy across patient populations is unclear. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of phase 3 trials evaluating BTKi-containing regimens in previously untreated MCL.
Methods: We systematically reviewed phase 3 randomized trials of frontline BTKi-containing regimens in MCL. A frequentist random-effects NMA was conducted for trials sharing a common comparator, with progression-free survival (PFS) expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and treatment ranking by P-scores. Trials without network connectivity were evaluated via structured cross-trial synthesis.
Results: were interpreted in the context of the patient population (older/transplant-ineligible vs younger/transplant-eligible) and treatment backbone. Results Four phase 3 trials (SHINE, ECHO, TRIANGLE, ENRICH) comprising 2388 patients were included. In the NMA for older, transplant-ineligible patients, both ibrutinib + bendamustine-rituximab (IBR+BR) and acalabrutinib + BR (ACA+BR) significantly improved PFS vs BR alone (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59–0.96] and HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57–0.94], respectively), with no significant difference between ACA+BR and IBR+BR (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.69–1.38]; ACA+BR ranked highest with a P-score of 0.78). In cross-trial synthesis, the chemotherapy-free ibrutinib-rituximab regimen (ENRICH) showed the longest PFS (median, 65.3 vs 42.4 months; HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52–0.90]). In younger, transplant-eligible patients (TRIANGLE), ibrutinib-containing regimens improved failure-free survival vs standard chemoimmunotherapy + autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; HR, approximately 0.52–0.56), with no clear additional benefit of ASCT when a BTKi was used. Grade ≥3 adverse event rates were comparable across arms.
Conclusions: BTKi-containing regimens consistently improve disease control in frontline MCL. Acalabrutinib and ibrutinib show comparable efficacy when added to chemoimmunotherapy in older patients, whereas chemotherapy-free BTKi approaches and BTKi-integrated strategies in younger patients may reduce the need for ASCT. Treatment selection should be individualized according to age, fitness, and toxicity profile