This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
1,267 posters, 47 videos, 13 topics, 4 sessions, 853 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
September 9 - 12, 2026 | George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston, Texas
ABCL - 438
Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma (ABCL)
Context: Mosun-Pola demonstrated superior efficacy versus R-GemOx, with infrequent cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events and manageable safety in patients with R/R LBCL in the Phase 3 SUNMO trial (NCT05171647; Budde et al. JCO 2025).
Objective: To report updated efficacy and safety, including in the 2L setting.
Methods: Patients with autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT)-ineligible R/R LBCL were randomized 2:1 to Mosun (subcutaneous)-Pola or R-GemOx. Dual primary endpoints: IRC-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints: complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), duration of CR (DOCR), safety. Overall survival (OS) was not assessed as the data cut-off was prior to the pre-defined final OS analysis.
Results: As of August 8, 2025, 138 and 70 patients were assigned to Mosun-Pola or R-GemOx, respectively. Ninety-one patients had 1 prior line of therapy (LOT; 2L; Mosun-Pola, n=61; R-GemOx, n=30) and 117 had ≥2 prior LOT (3L+; Mosun-Pola, n=77; R-GemOx, n=40). With a median follow-up of 28.3 months, Mosun-Pola continued to demonstrate superior PFS benefits over R-GemOx (11.6 versus 3.8 months; HR, 0.41; 95% CI: 0.28–0.60). ORRs with Mosun-Pola were 70.3% versus 40.0% with R-GemOx; CR rates were 51.4% versus 24.3%, respectively. The observed PFS benefit of Mosun-Pola over R-GemOx was similar in 2L (17.6 versus 3.6 months; HR, 0.38; 95% CI: 0.22–0.67) and 3L+ (8.6 versus 3.9 months; HR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.29–0.81) subgroups. With Mosun-Pola versus R-GemOx in 2L, the 2-year PFS rates were 40.3% versus 20.1%; the 2-year DOCR estimates were 60.8% versus 37.5%, respectively. Median DOCR was not reached with Mosun-Pola in the 2L and 3L+ subgroups. ORRs with Mosun-Pola versus R-GemOx were 75.4% versus 36.7% in 2L patients, and 66.2% versus 42.5% in 3L+ patients, respectively. The safety profile was unchanged since the primary analysis. Grade ≥2 CRS occurred in 4% of Mosun-Pola-treated patients and no ICANS events occurred. The safety profile was consistent in 2L patients: Grade 2 CRS occurred in 3% of Mosun-Pola-treated patients, with no Grade ≥3 CRS events.
Conclusions: Mosun-Pola continues to show notable efficacy with manageable safety in patients with ASCT-ineligible R/R LBCL, particularly in the 2L setting.