This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
875 posters, 25 topics, 3,440 authors, 1,061 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
March 25-28, 2026 | Tampa, FL, USA

P060
Abdominal Wall Hernias
Background:
Hernia repair outcomes are influenced by multiple factors with much focus on preoperative optimization. Various optimization criteria have been established; however, not all patients may meet these metrics before requiring emergent repair. This study evaluates the relative impact of optimization and timing on hernia repair outcomes.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry. All adult (≥18 years old) patients undergoing hernia repair between 1/2014-3/2022 were included if 30-day follow-up, diabetes, body mass index (BMI), and nicotine data were complete. Patients were categorized as Optimized (BMI<40kg/m2, no nicotine use, and either non-diabetic or diabetic with HbA1c<7.5) and Non-Optimized (BMI≥40kg/m2, and/or nicotine use, and/or diabetic with HbA1c ≥7.5). The primary outcomes were surgical site infections [SSIs] and recurrence. Demographics, hernia characteristics, and outcomes were also compared. Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson tests were used for unadjusted analyses. Binomial logistic regression models evaluated independent predictors of 30-day SSI and 1-year recurrence, adjusting for optimization, timing, surgical approach, hernia size, age, sex, race, and comorbidities.
Results:
66,811 patients were included: 54,879 Optimized (82%) and 11,932 Non-Optimized (18%). Non-Optimized patients were more often female (38% vs 29%, p<0.001), minority (19% vs 15%,p<0.001), had higher median BMI (33kg/m2, vs 28kg/m2, p<0.001), and larger median hernia widths (4cm vs 3cm, p<0.001). They had higher 30-day readmission (3.3% vs 2.1%, p<0.001), reoperation (1.4% vs 0.8%, p<0.001) SSOs (10.9% vs 6.4%, p<0.001), SSIs (2.8% vs 1.5%, p<0.001), and 1-year recurrence rates (18% vs 13%, p<0.001).
Regression modeling demonstrated that both optimization and timing of surgery wereindependent predictors of 30-day SSI and 1-year recurrence. Compared to non-optimized/elective patients, the optimized/emergent patient subgroup had significantly higher odds of 30-day SSI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.85). However, the odds of 1-year recurrence were not significantly different between these two subgroups (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.83-2.74).
Conclusions:
The balance of optimization and timing of repair proves challenging for hernia management. While optimization has been shown to improve outcomes, this study demonstrated that emergent status may be a stronger predictor of SSI even among optimized patients. Recurrence at 1 year does not seem to differ between non-optimized patients in the elective setting and optimized patients receiving emergent repairs. These findings highlight the importance of pragmaticoptimization strategies that reduce delay and help patients avoid emergent presentation.