This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
875 posters, 25 topics, 3,440 authors, 1,061 institutions
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
March 25-28, 2026 | Tampa, FL, USA

P319
Bariatric
Introduction
There are an estimated 6 million Americans aged over 20
years living with heart failure (HF), and this number is
projected to increase to >8 million by 2030 [1]. Obesity is
one of the strongest risk factors for developing HF [2],
and according to a large study of Framingham Heart
Study participants, the risk of HF increases by 5% in men
and 7% in women for every 1 kg/m2 increase in body
mass index (BMI) [3].
Several studies have shown that bariatric surgery is safe
in patients with HF [7-10], and improves their eligibility
and access to transplantation [4-6]. In some cases,
bariatric surgery has been shown to eliminate the need
for cardiac transplantation altogether [5]. With the
increasing use of durable left ventricular assist devices
(LVADs) in the treatment of HF, evidence is emerging
regarding the successful use of bariatric surgery in
patients with LVADs [17-19]. The effects of nonsurgical
bariatric intervention (i.e., medical weight loss
management, dietary restrictions) compared with bariatric
surgery have not been well characterized in patients with
HF and LVADs.
Aim
To evaluate cardiac function and body mass index (BMI)
in patients with obesity and heart failure presenting for
bariatric management at our institution. Compare
outcomes between surgically treated and non-surgically
treated managed patients, assessing differences in left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and BMI. Additionally,
to examine outcomes in patients with LVADs.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study reviewing the
electronic medical records of 25 patients with HF and a
BMI of 27 kg/m2 or more between 2019 and 2025.
Patients were stratified into surgically treated and non-
surgically treated managed cohorts. Patients were further
categorized from a cardiac standpoint based on whether
they had a durable LVAD or other advanced heart failure
therapy (AHFT). Changes in LVEF and BMI before and
after bariatric intervention were evaluated. Statistical
significance of differences in mean pre- and post-
intervention LVEF and BMI between cohorts was
assessed using paired t-tests.
Results
Twenty five patients were included in the study. The
cohort included 20 male patients (80%) and 5 female
(20%). Surgical procedures included 11 sleeve
gastrectomies and one Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The
non-surgical group was composed of 13 patients. Within
the surgically treated group, only one patient (8.4%) had
a LVAD and eleven (91.6%) were being treated with
AHFT, meanwhile the nonsurgical cohort 9 (69.2%) had
an LVAD and 4 (21.8%) were on AHFT. Mean LVEF in
patients undergoing surgical bariatric procedures was
18.75% before intervention and 26.58% after surgery,
reflecting an 7.8% absolute increase. 58% of the patients
had an increase of their LVEF after bariatric surgery while
three (25%) had their LVEF worsened. In patients on
AHFT who were treated with surgical bariatric
intervention, mean LVEF increased from 19.77% pre-
surgery to 28.09% post-surgery, reflecting an 8.3%
absolute increase. In the nonsurgical cohort, LVEF was
reduced from 20.88% pre- intervention to 19.07% post-
intervention.
Conclusions
Bariatric surgery is safe among patients with HF
and obesity. While LVEF improvement was not
statistically significant, its increase after bariatric
surgery may still highlight a plausible treatment
option for improvement of left ventricular function
in patients with obesity and HF.
Bariatric surgery was a more effective means of
reducing BMI and improving LVEF than
nonsurgical bariatric intervention.