This website and third-party tools we use rely on cookies for the best user experience. By selecting "I agree", you agree to cookie usage as described in our Privacy Policy.
197 posters, 15 videos, 1 topics, 31 sessions, 509 authors
ePostersLive by SciGen Technologies S.A. All rights reserved.
Conference ePosters

P147
Introduction:
The accuracy of guided implant placement relies heavily on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed surgical guides.
Post-printing factors can induce polymer relaxation or continued curing, thereby altering surgical guide accuracy: ambient light, water/humidity, and time. Variability in surgical guide stability may result in discrepancies between planned and actual implant positions.
AIM: To understand how different storage conditions affect dimensional changes of surgical guide material in order to optimize clinical reliability
Methods:
60 standardized surgical guide prototypes were printed using a HeyGears A2D 4K printer (DLP) and post-processed.
Samples were stored under 4 conditions (n = 15):
1. Dry/UV-Blocked (DU)
2. Dry/Ambient (DA)
3. Wet/Ambient (WA)
4. Wet/UV-Blocked (WU)
Results:
Divided into RMS estimates calculating 3D deviation and angle deviation calculation between the guides.
Statistics: Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey HSD post-hoc tests (α = .05) assessed effects of group and time.
RMS Estimate Difference: Significant effects for group (F = 22.61; P < .001), time (F = 15.10; P < .001), and interaction (F = 18.55; P < .001). The Dry/UV-Blocked group maintained the most stable RMS values throughout the 14 days.
Angle Deviation: Significant main effects of group (F = 13.95; P < .001) and time (F = 5.54; P = .0003), and a significant interaction (F = 2.68; P = .002). The Dry/UV-Blocked group consistently had the lowest deviation across all time points.
Trend: Stability decreased under wet and/or ambient light conditions, with Wet/UV-Blocked showing the greatest deviation over time.
Conclusion:
Dimensional stability of 3D-printed surgical guides is significantly influenced by storage condition and elapsed time after post-processing.
1. Dry, UV-blocked storage demonstrated the lowest RMS estimates and angle deviations, maintaining superior accuracy over 14 days.
2. Wet and light-exposed conditions promoted progressive dimensional distortion.
3. Clinically, dry, UV-blocked storage is recommended for maintaining surgical guide accuracy before implant placement.